Search or filter publications

Filter by type:

Filter by publication type

Filter by year:

to

Results

  • Showing results for:
  • Reset all filters

Search results

  • Journal article
    Behforootan S, Thorniley M, Minonzio J-G, Boughton O, Karia M, Bhattacharya R, Hansen U, Cobb J, Abel Ret al., 2022,

    , Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, Vol: 136, ISSN: 1751-6161

    The bone quality of patients undergoing hip replacement surgery is poorly predicted by radiographs alone. With better bone quality information available to a surgeon, the operation can be performed more safely. The aim of this study was to investigate whether ultrasound signals of cortical bone at peripheral sites such as the tibia and radius can be used to predict the compressive mechanical properties of cortical bone at the femoral neck.We recruited 19 patients undergoing elective hip arthroplasty and assessed the radius and tibia of these patients with the Azalée guided wave ultrasound to estimate the porosity and thickness of the cortex. Excess bone tissues were collected from the femoral neck and the compressive mechanical properties of the cortex were characterised under a mechanical loading rig to determine stiffness, ultimate strength, and density. The correlations between the ultrasound measurements and mechanical properties were analysed using linear regression, Pearson correlation statistics, and multiple regression analysis.Cortical mechanical properties were weakly to moderately correlated with the ultrasound measurements at various sites (R2 = 0.00–0.36). The significant correlations found were not consistent across all 4 peripheral measurement sites. Additionally, weak to moderate ability of the ultrasound to predict mechanical properties at the neck of femur with multiple regression analysis was found (R2 = 0.00–0.48). Again, this was inconsistent across the different anatomical sites. Overall, the results demonstrate the need for ultrasound scans to be collected directly from clinically relevant sites such as the femoral neck due to the inconsistency of mechanical properties across various sites.

  • Journal article
    Miles A, McRae J, Clunie G, Gillivan-Murphy P, Inamoto Y, Kalf H, Pillay M, Pownall S, Ratcliffe P, Richard T, Robinson U, Wallace S, Brodsky MBet al., 2022,

    , Dysphagia, Vol: 37, Pages: 1349-1374, ISSN: 0179-051X

    COVID-19 has had an impact globally with millions infected, high mortality, significant economic ramifications, travel restrictions, national lockdowns, overloaded healthcare systems, effects on healthcare workers’ health and well-being, and large amounts of funding diverted into rapid vaccine development and implementation. Patients with COVID-19, especially those who become severely ill, have frequently developed dysphagia and dysphonia. Health professionals working in the field have needed to learn about this new disease while managing these patients with enhanced personal protective equipment. Emerging research suggests differences in the clinical symptoms and journey to recovery for patients with COVID-19 in comparison to other intensive care populations. New insights from outpatient clinics also suggest distinct presentations of dysphagia and dysphonia in people after COVID-19 who were not hospitalized or severely ill. This international expert panel provides commentary on the impact of the pandemic on speech pathologists and our current understanding of dysphagia and dysphonia in patients with COVID-19, from acute illness to long-term recovery. This narrative review provides a unique, comprehensive critical appraisal of published peer-reviewed primary data as well as emerging previously unpublished, original primary data from across the globe, including clinical symptoms, trajectory, and prognosis. We conclude with our international expert opinion on what we have learnt and where we need to go next as this pandemic continues across the globe.

  • Journal article
    Newman H, Clunie G, Wallace S, Smith C, Martin D, Pattison Net al., 2022,

    , Journal of Critical Care, Vol: 72, Pages: 1-16, ISSN: 0883-9441

    Purpose: Tracheostomy is a common surgical procedure in ICU. Whilst often life-saving, it can have important impacts on patients. Much of the literature on tracheostomy focuses on timing and technique of insertion, risk factors and complications. More knowledge of patient experience of tracheostomy in ICU is needed to support person-centred care.Materials and Methods: Qualitative systematic review and metasynthesis of the literature on adult experience of tracheostomy in ICU. Comprehensive search of four bibliographic databases and grey literature. Title and abstract screening and full text eligibility was completed independently by two reviewers. Metasynthesis was achieved using thematic synthesis, supported by a conceptual framework of humanised care.Results: 2971 search returns were screened on title and abstract and 127 full texts assessed for eligibility. Thirteen articles were included for analysis. Five descriptive and three analytical themes were revealed. The over-arching theme was ‘To be seen and heard as a whole person’. Patients wanted to be treated as a human, and having a voice made this easier.Conclusions: Voice restoration should be given high priority in the management of adults with a tracheostomy in ICU. Staff training should focus on both technical skills and compassionate care to improve person-centred outcomes.

  • Journal article
    Hall AJ, Clement ND, Ojeda-Thies C, MacLullich AM, Toro G, Johansen A, White TO, Duckworth ADet al., 2022,

    , SURGEON-JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGES OF SURGEONS OF EDINBURGH AND IRELAND, Vol: 20, Pages: E429-E446, ISSN: 1479-666X
  • Journal article
    Ruparell K, Barve R, Tas RN, Chen S, Mclaughlin R, Ravendren A, Gupte CMet al., 2022,

    , BMJ OPEN, Vol: 12, ISSN: 2044-6055
  • Journal article
    van der Feltz-Cornelis CM, Sweetman J, Allsopp G, Attree E, Crooks MG, Cuthbertson DJ, Forshaw D, Gabbay M, Green A, Heightman M, Hillman T, Hishmeh L, Khunti K, Lip GYH, Lorgelly P, Montgomery H, Strain WD, Wall E, Watkins C, Williams N, Wootton DG, Banerjee A, STIMULATE-ICP Cet al., 2022,

    , PLoS One, Vol: 17, ISSN: 1932-6203

    IntroductionAs mortality rates from COVID-19 disease fall, the high prevalence of long-term sequelae (Long COVID) is becoming increasingly widespread, challenging healthcare systems globally. Traditional pathways of care for Long Term Conditions (LTCs) have tended to be managed by disease-specific specialties, an approach that has been ineffective in delivering care for patients with multi-morbidity. The multi-system nature of Long COVID and its impact on physical and psychological health demands a more effective model of holistic, integrated care. The evolution of integrated care systems (ICSs) in the UK presents an important opportunity to explore areas of mutual benefit to LTC, multi-morbidity and Long COVID care. There may be benefits in comparing and contrasting ICPs for Long COVID with ICPs for other LTCs.Methods and analysisThis study aims to evaluate health services requirements for ICPs for Long COVID and their applicability to other LTCs including multi-morbidity and the overlap with medically not yet explained symptoms (MNYES). The study will follow a Delphi design and involve an expert panel of stakeholders including people with lived experience, as well as clinicians with expertise in Long COVID and other LTCs. Study processes will include expert panel and moderator panel meetings, surveys, and interviews. The Delphi process is part of the overall STIMULATE-ICP programme, aimed at improving integrated care for people with Long COVID.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval for this Delphi study has been obtained (Research Governance Board of the University of York) as have approvals for the other STIMULATE-ICP studies. Study outcomes are likely to inform policy for ICPs across LTCs. Results will be disseminated through scientific publication, conference presentation and communications with patients and stakeholders involved in care of other LTCs and Long COVID.

  • Journal article
    Bicer M, Phillips ATM, Melis A, McGregor AH, Modenese Let al., 2022,

    , JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, Vol: 144, ISSN: 0021-9290
  • Journal article
    Rowland S, Fitzgerald EJ, Lungren M, Elizabeth HL, Harned Z, McGregor Aet al., 2022,

    , npj Digital Medicine, Vol: 5, Pages: 1-6, ISSN: 2398-6352

    The global digital health market is worth approximately 300 billion USD1 and is predicted to grow by up to 25% this year. Consequently, medical professionals are increasingly required to use digital technologies such as telehealth platforms, AI-driven clinical decision-making tools, digitally enabled surgical tools, mHealth technologies, or electronic health care records (EHR), as part of care delivery. These technologies hold clear benefits for enabling more efficient, modern care delivery however there are significant challenges to implementation, including when and how to use them, how to enable an accurate medical diagnosis in a virtual environment, interpretation and relevance of novel data points from digital devices, the potential for automation bias, appropriate utilisation of and engagement with digital disease management platforms and continuity of care in a digital world. Several of these issues have become apparent through the pandemic due to the hasty deployment of novel technologies as ‘bolt-on’ solutions to address standalone challenges in healthcare delivery, without consideration of the broader healthcare architecture. The majority of practicing clinicians are not sufficiently trained in how to safely integrate digital health technologies into the clinical workflow before encountering such technologies in practice. The introduction of digital health technologies may therefore represent a risk for medical error and subsequent malpractice liability. Medical malpractice is frequently defined as a physician’s failure to comply with customary medical practice,2 however the application of this standard in the context of digital health is challenging. What are the accepted norms for history and examination during a telehealth consult? How should these be documented on electronic systems? When is it safe to offer digital first solutions for disease management? What is the custom for clinicians to ensure continuity of care? If there is a me

  • Journal article
    Burge T, Jones G, Jordan C, Jeffers J, Myant Cet al., 2022,

    A computational tool for automatic selection of total knee replacementimplant size using x-ray images

    , Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, Vol: 10, Pages: 1-11, ISSN: 2296-4185

    Purpose: The aim of this study was to outline a fully automatic tool capable of reliably predicting the most suitable total kneereplacement implant sizes for patients, using bi-planar X-ray images. By eliminating the need for manual templating or guidingsoftware tools via the adoption of convolutional neural networks, time and resource requirements for pre-operative assessmentand surgery could be reduced, the risk of human error minimized, and patients could see improved outcomes.Methods: The tool utilizes a machine learning-based 2D – 3D pipeline to generate accurate predictions of subjects’ distal femur andproximal tibia bones from X-ray images. It then virtually fits different implant models and sizes to the 3D predictions, calculatesthe implant to bone root-mean-squared error and maximum over/under hang for each, and advises the best option for thepatient. The tool was tested on 78, predominantly White subjects (45 female/33 male), using generic femur component and tibiaplate designs scaled to sizes obtained for five commercially available products. The predictions were then compared to the groundtruth best options, determined using subjects’ MRI data.Results: The tool achieved average femur component size prediction accuracies across the five implant models of 77.95% in termsof global fit (root-mean-squared error), and 71.79% for minimizing over/underhang. These increased to 99.74% and 99.49% with ±1size permitted. For tibia plates, the average prediction accuracies were 80.51% and 72.82% respectively. These increased to99.74% and 98.98% for ±1 size. Better prediction accuracies were obtained for implant models with fewer size options, howeversuch models more frequently resulted in a poor fit.Conclusion: A fully automatic tool was developed and found to enable higher prediction accuracies than generally reported formanual templating techniques, as well as similar computational methods.

  • Journal article
    van der Kruk E, Strutton P, Koizia LJ, Fertleman M, Reilly P, Bull AMJet al., 2022,

    , npj Aging, Vol: 8, ISSN: 2731-6068

    Functional motor redundancy enables humans to move with distinct muscle activation patterns while achieving a similar outcome. Since humans select similar strategies, there seems to be an optimal control. However, older adults move differently to young adults. The question is whether this is this due to an altered reinforcement scheme, altered sensory inputs, or due to alterations in the neuromusculoskeletal systems, so that it is no longer optimal or possible to execute the same movement strategies. The aim of this study was to analyse natural compensation strategies in the vital daily-life-task, sit-to-walk, in relation to neuromuscular capacity and movement objectives in younger (27.2 ± 4.6 years, N = 27, 14���) and elderly (75.9 ± 6.3 years, N = 23, 12���) adults. Aspects of the neuromuscular system that are prone to age-related decline and feasible to quantify were assessed (i.e. strength, nerve conductivity, fear of falling). Kinematics and muscle activity were recorded and joint kinetics were estimated using biomechanical models. Elderly men consistently used their arms when standing up. This strategy was not associated with a lack of or a reduction in strength, but with a reduction, but no lack of, ankle joint range of motion, and with increased fear of falling. The results show that humans preferentially maintain a minimum threshold of neuromuscular reserve to cope with uncertainties which results in compensation prior to coming up against physical limitations. Smaller base of support while standing up, a compensatory strategy with possibly greater risk of falls, was associated with muscular weakness, and longer nerve conduction latencies.

  • Journal article
    Clunie G, Anderson C, Hughes C, Savage M, Roe J, Sandhu G, McGregor A, Alexander Cet al., 2022,

    , Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, Vol: 131, Pages: 962-970, ISSN: 0003-4894

    Objectives:To investigate how the symptoms of mucus and cough impact adults living with laryngotracheal stenosis, and to use this information to guide future research and treatment plans.Methods:A survey was developed with the support of patient advisors and distributed to people suffering with laryngotracheal stenosis. The survey comprised 15 closed and open questions relating to mucus and cough and included the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ). Descriptive statistics, X2 and thematic analyses were completed.Results:In total, 641 participants completed the survey, with 83.62% (n = 536) reporting problems with mucus; 79% having daily issues of varying severity that led to difficulties with cough (46.18%) and breathing (20.90%). Mucus affected voice and swallowing to a lesser degree. Respondents described a range of triggers; they identified smoky air as the worst environmental trigger. Strategies to manage mucus varied widely with drinking water (72.26%), increasing liquid intake in general (49.35%) and avoiding or reducing dairy (45.32%) the most common approaches to control symptoms. The LCQ showed a median total score of 14 (interquartile range 11-17) indicative of cough negatively affecting quality of life. Thematic analysis of free text responses identified 4 key themes—the Mucus Cycle, Social impact, Psychological impact, and Physical impact.Conclusion:This study shows the relevance of research focusing on mucus and cough and its negative impact on quality of life, among adults with laryngotracheal stenosis. It demonstrates the inconsistent advice and management strategies provided by clinicians for this issue. Further research is required to identify clearer treatment options and pathways.

  • Journal article
    Nowinka Z, Alagha MA, Mahmoud K, Jones GGet al., 2022,

    , JMIR FORMATIVE RESEARCH, Vol: 6
  • Journal article
    Preston B, Harris S, Villet L, Mattathil C, Cobb J, Riviere Cet al., 2022,

    , KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, Vol: 30, Pages: 3220-3227, ISSN: 0942-2056
  • Journal article
    Chidambaram S, Maheswaran Y, Patel K, Sounderajah V, Hashimoto DA, Seastedt KP, McGregor AH, Markar SR, Darzi Aet al., 2022,

    , SENSORS, Vol: 22
  • Conference paper
    Edwards T, Gupta S, Soussi D, Patel A, Khan S, Liddle A, Cobb J, Logishetty Ket al., 2022,

    , ASiT Surgical Conference, Publisher: OXFORD UNIV PRESS, ISSN: 0007-1323
  • Conference paper
    Lu V, Zhang J, Logishetty K, Khanduja Vet al., 2022,

    , ASiT Surgical Conference, Publisher: OXFORD UNIV PRESS, ISSN: 0007-1323
  • Conference paper
    Woodbridge H, Alexander C, Jones M, Gordon Aet al., 2022,

    , Intensive Care Society State of the Art 2021 Congress, Publisher: SAGE Publications
  • Journal article
    Sanz-Pena I, Arachchi S, Curtis-Woodcock N, Silva P, McGregor A, Newell Net al., 2022,

    , Prosthetics and Orthotics International, Vol: 46, Pages: e374-e382, ISSN: 0309-3646

    Objective: Obtaining patient geometry is crucial in scoliosis brace design for patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Advances in 3D scanning technologies provide the opportunity to obtain patient geometries quickly with fewer resources during the design process compared with the plaster-cast method. This study assesses the accuracy and repeatability of such technologies for this application.Methods: The accuracy and repeatability of three different handheld scanners and phone-photogrammetry was assessed using different mesh generation software. Twenty-four scans of a single subject's torso were analyzed for accuracy and repeatability based on anatomical landmark distances and surface deviation maps.Results: Mark II and Structure ST01 scanners showed maximum mean surface deviations of 1.74 ± 3.63 mm and 1.64 ± 3.06 mm, respectively. Deviations were lower for the Peel 1 scanner (maximum of −0.35 ± 2.8 mm) but higher with the use of phone-photogrammetry (maximum of −5.1 ± 4.8 mm). The mean absolute errors of anatomical landmark distance measurements from torso meshes obtained with the Peel 1, Mark II, and ST01 scanners were all within 9.3 mm (3.6%), whereas phone-photogrammetry errors were as high as 18 mm (7%).Conclusions: Low-cost Mark II and ST01 scanners are recommended for obtaining torso geometries because of their accuracy and repeatability. Subject’s breathing/movement affects the resultant geometry around the abdominal and anterolateral regions.

  • Journal article
    Lam K, Abramoff M, Balibrea J, Bishop S, Brady R, Callcut R, Chand M, Collins J, Diener M, Eisenmann M, Fermont K, Galvao Neto M, Hager G, Hinchliffe R, Horgan A, Jannin P, Langerman A, Logishetty K, Mahadik A, Maier-Hein L, Martin Antona E, Mascagni P, Mathew R, Mueller-Stich B, Neumuth T, Nickel F, Park A, Pellino G, Rudzicz F, Shah S, Slack M, Smith M, Soomro N, Speidel S, Stoyanov D, Tilney H, Wagner M, Darzi A, Kinross J, Purkayastha Set al., 2022,

    , npj Digital Medicine, Vol: 5, Pages: 1-9, ISSN: 2398-6352

    The use of digital technology is increasing rapidly across surgical specialities, yet there is noconsensus for the term ‘digital surgery’. This is critical as digital health technologies present technical, governance, and legal challenges which are unique to the surgeon and surgical patient. We aim to define the term digital surgery and the ethical issues surrounding its clinical application, and to identify barriers and research goals for future practice. 38 international experts, across the fields of surgery, AI, industry, law, ethics and policy, participated in a four-round Delphi exercise. Issues were generated by an expert panel and public panel through a scoping questionnaire around key themes identified from the literature and voted upon in two subsequent questionnaire rounds. Consensus was defined if >70% of the panel deemed the statement important and <30% unimportant. A final online meeting was held to discuss consensus statements. The definition of digital surgery as the use of technology for the enhancement of preoperative planning, surgical performance, therapeutic support, or training, to improve outcomes and reduce harm achieved 100% consensus agreement. We highlight key ethical issues concerning data, privacy, confidentiality and public trust, consent, law; litigation and liability, and commercial partnerships within digital surgery and identify barriers and research goals for future practice. Developers and users of digital surgery must not only have an awareness of the ethical issues surrounding digital applications in healthcare, but also the ethical considerations unique to digital surgery. Future research into these issues must involve all digital surgery stakeholders including patients.

  • Journal article
    Saggu R, Barlow P, Butler J, Ghaem-Maghami S, Hughes C, Lagergren P, McGregor A, Shaw C, Wells Met al., 2022,

    , BMC Women's Health, Vol: 22, Pages: 1-35, ISSN: 1472-6874

    Background: There is increasing recognition that prehabilitation is important as a means of preparing patients physically and psychologically for cancer treatment. However, little is understood about the role and optimal nature of prehabilitation for gynaecological cancer patients, who usually face extensive and life-changing surgery in addition to other treatments that impact significantly on physiological and psychosexual wellbeing. Review question: This scoping review was conducted to collate the research evidence on multimodal prehabilitation in gynaecological cancers and the related barriers and facilitators to engagement and delivery that should be considered when designing a prehabilitation intervention for this group of women. Methods: Seven medical databases and four grey literature repositories were searched from database inception to September 2021. All articles, reporting on multimodal prehabilitation in gynaecological cancers were included in the final review, whether qualitative, quantitative or mixed-methods. Qualitative on unimodal interventions were also included, as these were thought to be more likely to include information about barriers and facilitators which could also be relevant to multimodal interventions. A realist framework of context, mechanism and outcome was used to assist interpretation of findings. Results: In total, 24 studies were included in the final review. The studies included the following tumour groups: ovarian only (n=12), endometrial only (n=1), mixed ovarian, endometrial, vulvar (n=5) and non-specific gynaecological tumours (n=6). There was considerable variation across studies in terms of screening for prehabilitation, delivery of prehabilitation and outcome measures. Key mechanisms and contexts influencing engagement with prehabilitation can be summarised as: 1) The role of healthcare professionals and organisations 2) Patients’ perceptions of acceptability 3) Factors influencing patient motivation 4) Prehabilita

This data is extracted from the Web of Science and reproduced under a licence from Thomson Reuters. You may not copy or re-distribute this data in whole or in part without the written consent of the Science business of Thomson Reuters.

Request URL: http://www.imperial.ac.uk:80/respub/WEB-INF/jsp/search-t4-html.jsp Request URI: /respub/WEB-INF/jsp/search-t4-html.jsp Query String: id=770&limit=20&page=10&respub-action=search.html Current Millis: 1790350809399 Current Time: Fri Sep 25 16:40:09 BST 2026