Results
- Showing results for:
- Reset all filters
Search results
-
Journal articleLovstad A, Cawley P, 2012, , NDT & E INTERNATIONAL, Vol: 46, Pages: 83-93, ISSN: 0963-8695
- Cite
- Citations: 34
-
Journal articleFletcher S, Lowe MJS, Ratassepp M, et al., 2012, , JOURNAL OF NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION, Vol: 31, Pages: 56-64, ISSN: 0195-9298
- Cite
- Citations: 29
-
Journal articlePtaszek G, Cawley P, Almond D, et al., 2012, , NDT & E INTERNATIONAL, Vol: 45, Pages: 71-78, ISSN: 0963-8695
- Cite
- Citations: 31
-
Journal articleRibichini R, Cegla F, Nagy PB, et al., 2012, , NDT & E INTERNATIONAL, Vol: 45, Pages: 32-38, ISSN: 0963-8695
- Cite
- Citations: 76
-
Conference paperHuthwaite P, Simonetti F, 2012, , 38th Annual Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation (QNDE), Publisher: AMER INST PHYSICS, Pages: 777-784, ISSN: 0094-243X
- Cite
- Citations: 2
-
Conference paperDavies CM, Nagy P, Narayanan A, et al., 2012,
CONTINUOUS CREEP DAMAGE MONITORING USING A NOVEL POTENTIAL DROP TECHNIQUE
, ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, Publisher: AMER SOC MECHANICAL ENGINEERS, Pages: 35-+- Cite
- Citations: 5
-
Conference paperFan Z, Castaings M, Lowe MJS, et al., 2012, , 38th Annual Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation (QNDE), Publisher: AMER INST PHYSICS, Pages: 1307-1314, ISSN: 0094-243X
- Cite
- Citations: 1
-
Conference paperChoi W, Skelton E, Lowe MJS, et al., 2012, , 38th Annual Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation (QNDE), Publisher: AMER INST PHYSICS, Pages: 126-133, ISSN: 0094-243X
- Cite
- Citations: 1
-
Conference paperFan Z, Lowe MJS, 2012, , 38th Annual Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation (QNDE), Publisher: AMER INST PHYSICS, Pages: 873-880, ISSN: 0094-243X
- Cite
- Citations: 5
-
Conference paperJones RE, Simonetti F, Lowe MJS, et al., 2012, , 38th Annual Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation (QNDE), Publisher: AMER INST PHYSICS, Pages: 1665-1672, ISSN: 0094-243X
- Cite
- Citations: 3
-
Conference paperAttarian V, Cegla F, Cawley P, 2012, , 38th Annual Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation (QNDE), Publisher: AMER INST PHYSICS, Pages: 655-662, ISSN: 0094-243X
- Cite
- Citations: 2
-
Conference paperGalvagni A, Cawley P, 2012, , 38th Annual Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation (QNDE), Publisher: AMER INST PHYSICS, Pages: 1591-1598, ISSN: 0094-243X
- Cite
- Citations: 5
-
Conference paperCarandente R, Cawley P, 2012, , 38th Annual Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation (QNDE), Publisher: AMER INST PHYSICS, Pages: 1929-1936, ISSN: 0094-243X
- Cite
- Citations: 5
-
Conference paperCawley P, 2012, , 38th Annual Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation (QNDE), Publisher: AMER INST PHYSICS, Pages: 99-100, ISSN: 0094-243X
-
Conference paperRibichini R, Cegla F, Nagy PB, et al., 2012, , 38th Annual Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation (QNDE), Publisher: AMER INST PHYSICS, Pages: 955-962, ISSN: 0094-243X
- Cite
- Citations: 5
-
Conference paperPtaszek G, Cawley P, Almond D, et al., 2012, , 38th Annual Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation (QNDE), Publisher: AMER INST PHYSICS, Pages: 491-498, ISSN: 0094-243X
- Cite
- Citations: 1
-
Journal articleJackson MD, Leinov E, 2012, , International Journal of Geophysics, Vol: 2012, ISSN: 1687-8868
We find that the thin double layer assumption, in which the thickness of the electrical diffuse layer is assumed small comparedto the radius of curvature of a pore or throat, is valid in a capillary tubes model so long as the capillary radius is >200 times thedouble layer thickness, while the thick double layer assumption, in which the diffuse layer is assumed to extend across the entirepore or throat, is valid so long as the capillary radius is >6 times smaller than the double layer thickness. At low surface chargedensity (<10 mC · m−2) or high electrolyte concentration (>0.5 M) the validity criteria are less stringent. Our results suggest thatthe thin double layer assumption is valid in sandstones at low specific surface charge (<10 mC · m−2), but may not be valid insandstones of moderate- to small pore-throat size at higher surface charge if the brine concentration is low (<0.001 M). The thickdouble layer assumption is likely to be valid in mudstones at low brine concentration (<0.1 M) and surface charge (<10 mC·m−2),but at higher surface charge, it is likely to be valid only at low brine concentration (<0.003 M). Consequently, neither assumptionmay be valid in mudstones saturated with natural brines.
-
Journal articleRajagopal P, Drozdz M, Skelton E, et al., 2012,
On the use of absorbing layers to simulate the propagation of elastic waves in unbounded isotropic media using commercially available Finite Element packages
, NDT and E International, Vol: TBC -
Conference paperGalvagni A, Cawley P, 2012, , Conference on Health Monitoring of Structural and Biological Systems, Publisher: SPIE-INT SOC OPTICAL ENGINEERING, ISSN: 0277-786X
- Cite
- Citations: 3
-
Journal articleRajagopal P, Skelton EA, Choi W, et al., 2012,
A generic hybrid model for bulk elastodynamics, with application to ultrasonic non-destructive evaluation
, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, Vol: 59, Pages: 1239-TBC
This data is extracted from the Web of Science and reproduced under a licence from Thomson Reuters. You may not copy or re-distribute this data in whole or in part without the written consent of the Science business of Thomson Reuters.