Search or filter publications

Filter by type:

Filter by publication type

Filter by year:

to

Results

  • Showing results for:
  • Reset all filters

Search results

  • Journal article
    Lovstad A, Cawley P, 2012,

    , NDT & E INTERNATIONAL, Vol: 46, Pages: 83-93, ISSN: 0963-8695
  • Journal article
    Fletcher S, Lowe MJS, Ratassepp M, Brett Cet al., 2012,

    , JOURNAL OF NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION, Vol: 31, Pages: 56-64, ISSN: 0195-9298
  • Journal article
    Ptaszek G, Cawley P, Almond D, Pickering Set al., 2012,

    , NDT & E INTERNATIONAL, Vol: 45, Pages: 71-78, ISSN: 0963-8695
  • Journal article
    Ribichini R, Cegla F, Nagy PB, Cawley Pet al., 2012,

    , NDT & E INTERNATIONAL, Vol: 45, Pages: 32-38, ISSN: 0963-8695
  • Conference paper
    Huthwaite P, Simonetti F, 2012,

    , 38th Annual Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation (QNDE), Publisher: AMER INST PHYSICS, Pages: 777-784, ISSN: 0094-243X
  • Conference paper
    Davies CM, Nagy P, Narayanan A, Cawley Pet al., 2012,

    CONTINUOUS CREEP DAMAGE MONITORING USING A NOVEL POTENTIAL DROP TECHNIQUE

    , ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, Publisher: AMER SOC MECHANICAL ENGINEERS, Pages: 35-+
  • Conference paper
    Fan Z, Castaings M, Lowe MJS, Fromme P, Biateau Cet al., 2012,

    , 38th Annual Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation (QNDE), Publisher: AMER INST PHYSICS, Pages: 1307-1314, ISSN: 0094-243X
  • Conference paper
    Choi W, Skelton E, Lowe MJS, Craster R, Rajagopal Pet al., 2012,

    , 38th Annual Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation (QNDE), Publisher: AMER INST PHYSICS, Pages: 126-133, ISSN: 0094-243X
  • Conference paper
    Fan Z, Lowe MJS, 2012,

    , 38th Annual Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation (QNDE), Publisher: AMER INST PHYSICS, Pages: 873-880, ISSN: 0094-243X
  • Conference paper
    Jones RE, Simonetti F, Lowe MJS, Bradley IPet al., 2012,

    , 38th Annual Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation (QNDE), Publisher: AMER INST PHYSICS, Pages: 1665-1672, ISSN: 0094-243X
  • Conference paper
    Attarian V, Cegla F, Cawley P, 2012,

    , 38th Annual Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation (QNDE), Publisher: AMER INST PHYSICS, Pages: 655-662, ISSN: 0094-243X
  • Conference paper
    Galvagni A, Cawley P, 2012,

    , 38th Annual Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation (QNDE), Publisher: AMER INST PHYSICS, Pages: 1591-1598, ISSN: 0094-243X
  • Conference paper
    Carandente R, Cawley P, 2012,

    , 38th Annual Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation (QNDE), Publisher: AMER INST PHYSICS, Pages: 1929-1936, ISSN: 0094-243X
  • Conference paper
    Cawley P, 2012,

    , 38th Annual Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation (QNDE), Publisher: AMER INST PHYSICS, Pages: 99-100, ISSN: 0094-243X
  • Conference paper
    Ribichini R, Cegla F, Nagy PB, Cawley Pet al., 2012,

    , 38th Annual Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation (QNDE), Publisher: AMER INST PHYSICS, Pages: 955-962, ISSN: 0094-243X
  • Conference paper
    Ptaszek G, Cawley P, Almond D, Pickering Set al., 2012,

    , 38th Annual Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation (QNDE), Publisher: AMER INST PHYSICS, Pages: 491-498, ISSN: 0094-243X
  • Journal article
    Jackson MD, Leinov E, 2012,

    , International Journal of Geophysics, Vol: 2012, ISSN: 1687-8868

    We find that the thin double layer assumption, in which the thickness of the electrical diffuse layer is assumed small comparedto the radius of curvature of a pore or throat, is valid in a capillary tubes model so long as the capillary radius is >200 times thedouble layer thickness, while the thick double layer assumption, in which the diffuse layer is assumed to extend across the entirepore or throat, is valid so long as the capillary radius is >6 times smaller than the double layer thickness. At low surface chargedensity (<10 mC · m−2) or high electrolyte concentration (>0.5 M) the validity criteria are less stringent. Our results suggest thatthe thin double layer assumption is valid in sandstones at low specific surface charge (<10 mC · m−2), but may not be valid insandstones of moderate- to small pore-throat size at higher surface charge if the brine concentration is low (<0.001 M). The thickdouble layer assumption is likely to be valid in mudstones at low brine concentration (<0.1 M) and surface charge (<10 mC·m−2),but at higher surface charge, it is likely to be valid only at low brine concentration (<0.003 M). Consequently, neither assumptionmay be valid in mudstones saturated with natural brines.

  • Journal article
    Rajagopal P, Drozdz M, Skelton E, Lowe MJS, Craster RVet al., 2012,

    On the use of absorbing layers to simulate the propagation of elastic waves in unbounded isotropic media using commercially available Finite Element packages

    , NDT and E International, Vol: TBC
  • Conference paper
    Galvagni A, Cawley P, 2012,

    , Conference on Health Monitoring of Structural and Biological Systems, Publisher: SPIE-INT SOC OPTICAL ENGINEERING, ISSN: 0277-786X
  • Journal article
    Rajagopal P, Skelton EA, Choi W, Lowe MJS, Craster RVet al., 2012,

    A generic hybrid model for bulk elastodynamics, with application to ultrasonic non-destructive evaluation

    , IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, Vol: 59, Pages: 1239-TBC

This data is extracted from the Web of Science and reproduced under a licence from Thomson Reuters. You may not copy or re-distribute this data in whole or in part without the written consent of the Science business of Thomson Reuters.

Request URL: http://www.imperial.ac.uk:80/respub/WEB-INF/jsp/search-t4-html.jsp Request URI: /respub/WEB-INF/jsp/search-t4-html.jsp Query String: id=388&limit=20&page=12&respub-action=search.html Current Millis: 1777420500935 Current Time: Wed Apr 29 00:55:00 BST 2026